I used [SavedAttachment] to handle attachments in 5.1. But no with 5.2 the [SavedAttachment] does not have any values anymore. Got the message: Found 0 values for SavedAttachment
Finished
········ Running action Must contain attachment xml
Determining if 'Server config 4RT-88.xml' contains any value
The condition has been met
········ Running action Save attachments
Saving attachment Server config 4RT-88.xml
The following fields will be available for the next actions:
SavedAttachmentPath D:\documentor\attReceived\Server config 4RT-88.xml
········ Running action for every attachment
Found 0 values for SavedAttachment
Finished
Last edited by mdehoog on Mon Feb 18, 2019 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Same attachment output with 5.1 which works ok.
········ Running action Save attachments
Saving attachment configuration map production server A22.properties
The following fields will be available for the next actions:
SavedAttachment D:\documentor\attReceived\configuration map production serv ......
········ Running action for every attachment
Found 1 value for SavedAttachment
Set 1 of 1
SavedAttachment D:\documentor\attReceived\configuration map production serv ......
······· Running action rename attachment
Running copy "D:\documentor\attReceived\configuration map production server A22.properties" "D:\documentor\attReceived\configuration map production server A22.properties-050c01d4c772$6ddb8850$499298f0$.xmlx"
Hi,
From the version 5.2, the action that saves the attachments of the email names the fields "SavedAttachmentPath" instead of "SavedAttachment".
We changed that to avoid confusion with the actual contents of the file.
I will update this now in the changes announced for the 5.2 release in the Blog section of this website. It was not noticed there.
From the version 5.2, the action that saves the attachments of the email names the fields "SavedAttachmentPath" instead of "SavedAttachment".
We changed that to avoid confusion with the actual contents of the file.
I will update this now in the changes announced for the 5.2 release in the Blog section of this website. It was not noticed there.
Yes indeed it works. Yhks.